Star Control II
Paul Reiche III and Fred Ford, 1992

Star Control II is my favorite video game.  This would probably be a more impressive statement if I had played more than a handful of video games in the past twenty years.  Let's see, there was Civilization IV…  Europa Universalis II…  Alpha Centauri… and a bunch of casual things I found on the web.  It's better than Peggle is I guess what I am saying.  So let me rephrase.  Star Control II is one of my favorite pieces of entertainment in any medium.  Once I even went so far as to say that I would give it the same perfect score that I gave Watchmen.  But that was quite some time ago — long enough ago that Skype screen sharing hadn't been invented yet.  Now it has, so recently I watched, listened, and kibitzed as my pal Zoe the Squirrel played Star Control II 2800 miles away.

(Before I go on, I should specify that I had her play the DOS version that I played back in the '90s, not the freeware version known as The Ur-Quan Masters.  I have just enough OCD that The Ur-Quan Masters drives me up the wall.  The navigation window fades between zoom levels instead of cutting!  There's an intrusive moving arrow in the dialogue sequences!  The font tracking is wrong!  There's an ellipsis where there's not supposed to be!  Nnnnnngaaaa!!!!  At least there's an option to turn off the horrible voice tracks that were added for the 3DO version back in 1994.  I would say that the voice acting is terrible, and it's not great, but that isn't even the problem — Star Control II shouldn't have voice acting at all!  The character of each alien's communication style was intended to be conveyed via music and typeface — the voices totally undermine that.  Even putting that aside — some things are effective when read, some are effective when spoken, and surprisingly few are effective both ways.  Star Control II was designed to be read.  The voices are an abomination.  I will brook no dissent on this point.)

So, how did it hold up?  Not perfectly, but pretty darn well.  The game begins with a short slideshow laying out the premise: in the first half of the 22nd century, Earth and its allies were fighting a losing war against the Ur-Quan Hierarchy, a group of aliens bent on enslaving all free sentients.  A group of colonists was secretly sent to a nearby star system, where you were born and grew up.  Now you have a powerful starship and have set off on your first voyage to Earth, to see how your ancestral homeworld is faring in the war and whether you can turn the tide.  I won't tell you what exactly you find, but I guess it's not giving too much away to say that "the Ur-Quan have already been resoundingly defeated without your help" isn't it.

Star Control II is very open-ended.  You are plunked down in a sector of the galaxy containing over 500 stars and over 3800 worlds, and you can go to any of them your fuel tanks allow.  At any given time you'll have a few leads that give you some sense of where you might want to go, but initially your main goal is to gather minerals to improve the capabilities of your ship.  And this is just a matter of exploration.  You fly from star to star and planet to planet, scanning each one in turn until you find one worth landing on.  This type of exploring was one of my favorite things about the game my first time through.  It was also one of my favorite things about the game that established this genre, Starflight by Binary Systems.  Starflight came out in the summer of 1986, and I spent many late nights that year in my father's little home office, where the computer was.  In Starflight, your scanners told you what kinds of minerals a planet had and how abundant they were, but not where they were; to get them, first you had to land, like so:

Once you had landed, you moved your rover one square at a time, looking for the icon that indicated minerals.  You then rolled up next to the minerals, went through a little menu to scan them, and then scrolled down to the command to pick them up.  It was laborious — and yet it was also compelling.  Sitting in that downstairs office at 2:30 a.m. while everyone else was upstairs sleeping, the sound of the sprinklers outside drowned out by the the grinding of the rover's engines, I really felt as though I were rolling across the lonely, barren wastes of an alien planet.  Star Control II mineral collection is more arcade-like.  The map of each planet is much, much smaller, and you pick up minerals just by rolling over them, the way Pac-Man eats dots.  There are no ghosts to chase you, but on some planets there are various sorts of alien beasties that you can tranquilize and put into stasis aboard your ship, if they don't kill you first.  You also have earthquakes, hotspots, and lightning strikes to dodge.  Once you get far enough along in the game, you can buy tech that will protect your lander from these hazards, allowing you to visit planets that would have been too dangerous at the beginning.  It definitely makes for livelier gameplay than the Starflight approach, and while it doesn't evoke the same sense of traversing continents like the explorers of old, there was still something kind of awesome (in the pre-'80s sense) about hovering above each new planet, watching it rotate, listening to the music that played while you were in orbit. 

This time around I have to admit that I found myself reflecting from time to time about just how easy we all were to amuse back in the day.  To think of the hours I spent on Tron Deadly Discs and the like… how many times can you de-rez a bunch of identical blue guys before it gets old?  Similarly, how did it not get old to fly to hundreds of different planets and moons and see the same couple of dozen types appear in the window, the same blobs of minerals on the scanner?  I would have guessed that this kind of repetitive busywork wouldn't fly these days — but it turned out that scouting out planets and scooping up twenty units of astatine and shooting giant purple worms were just as absorbing to Zoe in 2013 as they were to me in 1992.

But there's way more to Star Control II than fetching rocks.  The sector of the galaxy in which the game takes place is inhabited by something on the order of thirty spacefaring species, and your interactions with them make up the heart of the game.  Some of these interactions involve combat; the original Star Control was really just an update of Spacewar, and while as far as I know I was the only one in my dorm who played through the full Star Control II adventure, the sound of its "Super-Melee" arcade mode echoed through the halls for months.  There is a huge, wildly varied assortment of colorful ships to choose from, each with its own distinctive abilities: one ship has a tractor beam, one has a 50% chance of magically resurrecting itself after being blown up, one can hypnotize enemy crew members into jumping out the airlock, one can transform into a comet… it's much more fun than your standard space combat game.  I got really good at it.  Back in the day I could take out a whole fleet of 30-point Dreadnoughts, Marauders, and Avatars with a single ten-point Thraddash Torch.  And yet when I think about Star Control II, the combat is little more than a footnote.  It wasn't really part of Zoe's game at all — she turned on "cyborg mode" and let the computer do the fighting.  No, to me Star Control II was first and foremost a conversation game.  The lion's share of the fun comes from flying out to different corners of the map, having the encounter alarm go off, and seeing what manner of creatures pop up on the viewscreen and what they have to say.

And the main reason I have loved Star Control II so much is that these aliens make up a wonderful, diverse, and sharply written cast of characters, rendered in gorgeous pixel art.  The intimidating aliens are impressively intimidating.  The enigmatic aliens are compellingly enigmatic.  The funny aliens are hilarious — and each group of aliens is hilarious in a very different way!  One is dryly sarcastic, one is new-age and daffy, one is full of double entendres, one is made up of different species who bicker with each other… you know how a while back I was complaining about how you can look at any given speech balloon in a Brian Bendis comic and the only way to figure out who said it is by following the tail?  Paul Reiche III is the anti-Bendis.  Every line of dialogue is instantly identifiable by style alone.  And the lines add up to a story that is deeper than you might expect for a largely comedic space adventure game.  For instance, there turn out to be three primary villains in the story, but all three are sinned against as well as sinning.  And it emerges that not all of the good guys have entirely clean hands — least of all the humans.  Would that the people who dominate our national discourse were capable of this kind of nuance.

I do have some criticisms, but before I get to them, I should emphasize that I still think the writing is extremely strong — and that's not just nostalgia talking, because this was brand new to Zoe and she loved the dialogue and the characterization as well.  Buuut… I do have to concede that this time around some of the humor struck me as pretty puerile.  This is especially true where the player's own dialogue options are concerned.  You generally have a menu consisting of one or two bland statements or questions (e.g., "We come in peace," "What can you tell us about your species?"), a death threat, and an insult that wouldn't be out of place on Beavis and Butt-head.  Now, this in and of itself might not be particularly irksome.  But compare Star Control II to another game written around the same time and for roughly the same audience: The Secret of Monkey Island.  In this game you play Guybrush Threepwood, a 19-year-old aspiring pirate.  Guybrush's conversational options aren't too different from those offered to the player in Star Control II — a little more hapless, maybe, but all in all they paint a picture of a pretty similar character.  But that's just the thing — in Monkey Island, that character is Guybrush Threepwood. In Star Control II, by contrast, the very first thing the player must do is select a name.  Zoe, naturally, picked "Zoe," and for the rest of the game the non-player characters would say things like "Greetings, Captain Zoe" and "Be careful out there, Captain Zoe." But Zoe had no control over what Captain Zoe was like.  Oh, I suppose you could argue that she did insofar as she got to select Captain Zoe's responses from a menu, but (as my IF piece Narcolepsy makes explicit) I have always thought of dialogue menus as representing the possible responses that have crossed the player character's mind.  So when Captain Zoe met a species of toucan-like aliens, the game declared that Captain Zoe was oafish enough to actively consider "Hey! Bird-brains! Got any fruit loops? Har-har-har!" as a greeting, and real-life Zoe had no say in the matter.  And then about midway through the game characters suddenly started referring to her as "he."  Note that there is no indication in the introductory slideshow that you're supposed to be playing a guy — we see both men and women as the game describes your mission.  We do see the player character in the concluding slideshow, though, and he's a 20ish white guy with blond hair who looks a fair bit like Guybrush Threepwood.  Critics have complained for decades about the lack of diversity among lead characters in the media — in 1970s film theory, the process of encouraging audiences to identify with this white guy or that white guy was dubbed "interpellation."  But Star Control II takes interpellation to another level.  It doesn't ask players to place themselves in the shoes of some blond dude the way Monkey Island does — it invites them to play as themselves, and takes for granted that they will see themselves in the pronoun "he" and in the blond dude the game wheels out at the end.  It's one thing to write a game designed to appeal to teenage boys and another to write one that discounts the possibility that the person on the other side of that crazy glass typewriter might not be a teenage boy.  Zoe was happy to play the former, but felt pretty shitty when it morphed into the latter.

(Incidentally, this is a big part of what my IF piece Endless, Nameless is about.  My feeling on the matter is that since players can never really play themselves — in Star Control II, the player character is from the planet Unzervalt, and no actual player is from Unzervalt — to avoid giving the player character a distinct identity is nearly always a mistake.)

I want to conclude by saying a bit about the game's design.  Again, for the most part I thought it was very strong.  In particular, I was impressed by the way that at any given point you could go anywhere, but there were pretty much always only a handful of places you wanted to go — not one, because that would make the game feel as though it were on rails, but not a million, because that would be overwhelming.  (And not zero, because then you'd have no reason not to quit.)  I do have a couple of criticisms, though.  One is that as wonderful as the aliens were, they were also in some respects just a big group of lock-and-key puzzles: each group has something you want (even if you don't yet know what it is), and you figure out what you have to give them or do for them to get them to give up their prize.  Once they have, their role in the game is generally done.  This can be a problem when you (a) have finished your productive interactions with a group of aliens, (b) are in their space, and (c) are slower than they are.  You will be stuck having encounter after encounter that amounts to the two of you saying hello and goodbye.  I know disk space was still at a premium back in 1992, but these days I might be tempted to load up each alien species with a huge selection of things to say (and Reiche and Ford actually did do this with at least one of them, to great effect).  I guess the problem with that idea is that a lot of players don't feel as though they're done until they've seen everything the game has to offer, so they might sit there having a hundred encounters in a row with the same species just to exhaust the conversational options.  And then be back in the same boat as before. 

My second criticism of the game's design has to do with interactivity — specifically, the player's freedom to shape the story.  For the most part, Star Control II is excellent on this score.  A lot of games — Star Control 3, for one! — assume that you will accomplish tasks in a certain order, and if you happen to deviate from that, things go haywire — you find yourself with conversational options referring to information you haven't actually heard yet, for instance.  That doesn't happen in this game, which is really kind of impressive for a game this large and open-ended.  What can happen, though, is that you miss pieces of information and don't realize it.  For instance, since Zoe tried to avoid combat whenever possible and was frightened of the scarier aliens, she avoided a vast area of the map where two of the main antagonists hung out.  If I hadn't told her to talk to each of them at least once, she might well have made it all the way to the winning ending without ever having heard the bad guys tell their sides of the story — i.e., without ever learning what the war was really about!  The freedom Star Control II offers is the same freedom I discussed in my article on Jon Ingold's All Roads: the freedom to experience a worse story.  Not one with a worse outcome for the player — one whose quality as a story is worse.

Graham Nelson famously described adventure games as "a crossword at war with a narrative," and there is indeed a fundamental tension at the heart of the form.  As a game designer, you want to hide the good stuff from players — it's the prospect of that reward that motivates players to undertake the challenges you've set before them.  But as an author, you want to make sure players don't miss any of the good stuff, because if they do, they'll have a lower opinion of your game!  You're sort of in an arms race against yourself.  You might arrange things so that players can't make it to the end unless they've seen all the good stuff… but then it's tempting to put in Easter eggs, to give an extra reward to players who are clever enough to try unusual things.  But then you still don't want anyone to miss how clever you've been, so you add a "Have You Tried…?" section at the end to point out all your Easter eggs and make sure no one underrates your game.  Now, apparently giving players the freedom to miss hearing the villains' motivation didn't hurt the reception of Star Control II any, for it is pretty much universally beloved, and rightly so.  But as a general rule, the old-school "suboptimal play gets you gruesomely killed" beats the newer-school "suboptimal play gets you a less satisfying story and you might not even realize it" all hollow.

And that just about wraps it up for this article, so I guess it's time to say goodbye.  Hello!!  I am only joke.  It is funny enough.  Do not forget to *enjoy the sauce*!!!

reply via
comment on
return to the
Calendar page