The Winter Olympics are underway, as immortalized in Wallace Stevens's landmark
poem "Thirteen Ways of Falling Down a Mountain." Seeing as I moved back to California
in large part so I would never have to think about winter ever again, I am not very
excited about the Winter Olympics, though I am sure that the games in Torino will be
every bit as good as those in Athinai and Moskva. No, my excitement came earlier, when
the emblem was unveiled.
I love Olympic emblems. I love to see how each city will represent its games as a
colorful abstraction. These emblems are a relatively recent development; for three
quarters of a century, the Olympics offered not emblems, but posters, some of which
are very nice in their own right:
| |
|
Stockholm 1912 | |
Antwerp 1920 |
In the 1930s, these posters were reduced to single images, becoming much closer to
the emblems of our day, though significantly more ornate:
| |
|
Los Angeles 1932 | |
Berlin 1936 |
After the war the posters returned. They were pretty simple as posters go, but posters
they were:
| |
| |
|
Helsinki 1952 | |
Melbourne 1956 | |
Rome 1960 |
Then came the 1960s. On the Summer Games side, the posters lost their
representational elements and became purely abstract, but hadn't yet developed
unique emblems. Japan just repurposed its own flag, while Mexico offered a
psychedelic logo but no emblem:
| |
|
Tokyo 1964 | |
Mexico City 1968 |
Meanwhile, the Winter Games of the 1960s came extremely close to supplying modern
emblems; the only difference was that they were built around the Olympic rings:
| |
|
Innsbruck 1964 | |
Grenoble 1968 |
So I tend to think of the breakthrough year as 1972, the first year that the Olympics
used true standalone emblems — yes, they usually appeared next to or on top of
the Olympic rings, but still, they were the unique elements that separated their
particular games from all the others. First came Sapporo with its fat snowflake:
|
Sapporo 1972 |
And then Munich with its completely abstract, geometrical,
non-representational logo:
|
Munich 1972 |
And that's what's fascinating to me. These artists were given a remit
to create a design that somehow evoked West Germany at the tail end of the
psychedelic era... and didn't they kind of succeed? Wouldn't this one have
looked all wrong for LA '84 or Sydney 2000?
Then we have this:
|
Montreal 1976 |
What is this? Is it supposed to be a stylized maple leaf? Are the rings plummeting
down the page? Is that supposed to be the letter M somehow? If it's not representational,
it's a failure, as it certainly doesn't look pretty on its own. Sigh... it took me twenty
years to figure out the Expos' logo, too.
| |
|
Lake Placid 1980 | |
Sarajevo 1984 |
I don't get Lake Placid's emblem either. Is it a ski track? It looks like there's
a mountain figuring in there, but then what's the vertical part? Not a big fan of
this one. I don't like the lopsidedness and the combination of straight lines with
a couple of random curves. Sarajevo's is, I assume, another stylized snowflake,
though it looks to me more like a representation of the game Warlords on the Atari
2600, which I guess is pretty appropriate given the year.
And speaking of the era, welcome to the Cold War:
| |
|
Moscow 1980 | |
Los Angeles 1984 |
Doesn't this kind of sum up communism vs. capitalism in the 1980s? The Soviet
emblem looks like something out of the early 1960s, much like the USSR's civilian
technology at the time. "Comrade, you must design emblem that connotes reaching
higher, and also building! For your service to the Motherland you will be given
three extra ration cards and loaf of stale bread!" Meanwhile, the American emblem
could only have come from a bloated advertising firm, and could not be more firmly
rooted in the '80s without wearing an argyle sweater vest. I was living in Southern
California at the time, and I saw this emblem, oh, about 500,000 times. I even tried
doodling it from time to time but it was just too complicated. The Soviet one I
could have done!
| |
|
Calgary 1988 | |
Seoul 1988 |
1988 brought us some good ones, Calgary with its stylized snowflake-slash-maple leaf
and Seoul with a samtaeguk design. I remember seeing these all over the place
too, and I didn't even live in Canada or Korea.
| |
|
Albertville 1992 | |
Barcelona 1992 |
1992's offerings pretty much sucked, however. Albertville gave us a skiing flame
wrapped in a flag of Savoy (currently burning all over the Muslim world due to its
similarity to the flag of Denmark), while Barcelona produced this stylized jumping
guy. Elements representing athletic competition returned — with ugly results.
Then the Winter Olympics were moved so as to be staggered between Summer Olympic
years. Thanks to the Tonya Harding vs. Nancy Kerrigan saga, the 1994 games got a
lot of hype, so it's a good thing they had such a great emblem. Nagano's was
very nice, too:
| |
|
Lillehammer 1994 | |
Nagano 1998 |
In between was Atlanta, which I knew going in had possibly the best emblem to date;
when the city was awarded the games in 1989, this was printed in every newspaper:
|
Atlanta 1996 bid |
The star, the circle, the A's, the Olympic colors... terrific! So imagine my
horror when 1996 rolled around and suddenly this logo was everywhere:
|
Atlanta 1996 |
What an eyesore! That color scheme! Gah! That was when I learned that bid
emblems were not necessarily representative of the later official emblems of each
running of the games. A bitter lesson!
This lesson was repeated in 2000. Here were the candidates:
| |
| |
|
Beijing 2000 bid | |
Berlin 2000 bid | |
Brasilia 2000 bid |
| |
|
Istanbul 2000 bid | |
Sydney 2000 bid |
Sydney is clearly the class of this group, making it all the more
disappointing when the official logo was just a rehash of Barcelona:
|
Sydney 2000 |
Salt Lake marginally improved on its bid emblem when creating its official
emblem, though it's another fricking snowflake:
| |
|
Salt Lake City 2002 bid | |
Salt Lake City 2002 |
The 2004 group offered up some extremely impressive emblems, all
representational but stylized:
| |
|
Athens 2004 bid | |
Buenos Aires 2004 bid |
| |
| |
|
Cape Town 2004 bid | |
Rome 2004 bid | |
Stockholm 2004 bid |
These are beautiful! The Stockholm and Athens ones are less so than the others,
true, but Athens then redeemed itself by breaking a string of bad official emblems
with this wonderful one:
|
Athens 2004 |
This brings us to the present. Turin improved upon its bid emblem, which wasn't
bad to begin with:
| |
|
Turin 2006 bid | |
Turin 2006 |
Beijing learned from its 2000 debacle and offered up a much better emblem for
its 2008 bid, only to follow in the footsteps of Barcelona and Sydney
for the real thing:
| |
|
Beijing 2008 bid | |
Beijing 2008 |
Vancouver's bid emblem for 2010 wasn't terrible, but it didn't look remotely like
an Olympic emblem. The official one does:
| |
|
Vancouver 2010 bid | |
Vancouver 2010 |
Time to move on to 2012... except the candidate cities didn't all
supply emblems! London and Paris went with simple logos...
| |
|
London 2012 bid | |
Paris 2012 bid |
...and the emblems supplied by the other three were perfunctory...
| |
| |
|
Madrid 2012 bid | |
Moscow 2012 bid | |
New York 2012 bid |
Of course, even Madrid did better than some of the cities that didn't
make it to the finals. Pittsburgh's emblem looks like it was cranked
out on a copy of Corel Draw from 1989:
|
Pittsburgh 2012 bid |
On the flip side, some other non-finalists turned in the best emblems
of the year:
| |
|
Sao Paulo 2012 bid | |
Stuttgart 2012 bid |
The next games to be awarded will be the 2014 Winter Olympics; the announcement is due
in 2007. Those emblems will probably just be more snowflakes. But then in 2009 comes
the selection of the site for the 2016 Summer Olympics, and Dubai is one of the contenders.
If the skyscrapers being built in
Dubai are anything to go by, this will be the most ostentatious Olympic emblem ever.
I can't wait!
Return to the Calendar page!
|