2023.07minutiae
  • A quote I happened across, from the introduction to a 1975 textbook called States of Matter by David L. Goodstein:

    Ludwig Boltzmann, who spent much of his life studying statistical mechanics, died in 1906, by his own hand.  Paul Ehrenfest, carrying on the work, died similarly in 1933.  Now it is our turn to study statistical mechanics.

  • A fun sign near my house:

  • For our summer vacation this year we didn’t go to the sea­shore, though; Ellie wanted to go to a lake in the Sierras, since she had seen some pictures of various such lakes and wanted to see one for herself.  That seemed like a good idea to me⁠—after all, this might be the last summer that Califor­nia even has lakes!⁠—but most of the ones she’d been looking at were at the end of mountain trails ten miles long, and that ain’t for me.  I’m not very outdoorsy.  I figure that if previous generations had meant for me to spend my time outdoors, they wouldn’t have invented doors.  So I looked into lakes we could drive to, and put together an itinerary consisting of three clusters of lakes.

    • The first were the Echo Lakes, but these proved too inaccessible.  The drive to the parking area was not for the faint of heart, and once we got there, it was unclear how to actually get down to the lakes, so we make an impromptu change of plans and went to Lake Tahoe instead.  However, while I know there are ways to get to the lakeshore for free (because I have), the spot where we landed was fenced off, and to be allowed through the gate we would have needed to have paid $25 and booked in advance.  And Tahoe wasn’t even on our list, so rather than find our way to a spot with free access we went to our hotel and thence to our second destination…

    • …the Mammoth Lakes; once we got there, a helpful guide directed us to Horseshoe Lake in particular.  (Ellie wanted to swim, and the guide said that Horseshoe Lake would be best for that since it was so full of car­bon dioxide that all the fish had died and we therefore wouldn’t have to compete for space with people fish­ing.)  Horseshoe Lake turned out to be very cold, though, as you might expect from what is essentially a bowl full of recent snowmelt, and we soon moved on.

    • Our last stop, then, was the June Lake Loop.  June Lake was surrounded by a gravel beach that hurt to walk on and was crowded, but at least the water was warmer.  It wasn’t pleasant, but it was tolerable.  What was pleas­ant was floating in the inflatable ring (heart-shaped and full of glitter) that Ellie had brought⁠—that was actually delightful and I could do that every day.  The amusing thing about that was that, if you look at the map linked above, you’ll see that the lobe of the lake near the beach is extremely shallow.  We got quite a ways out and were floating around in the currents feeling as though we were out to sea, but we actually remained at wading pool depth the entire time.  Not only could we get out and stand up whenever we wanted, but the floatie was actually below waist level.  Anyway, 10/10 would float again, as the kids say.

  • The last few times I went outside on one of these summer trips I wound up with a sunburn, particularly on my nose, as I worked my way up from SPF 15 to SPF 30 and 50.  This summer I went all the way up to 70.  And it finally worked!  How do I know?  Because I still had my shoes on when I put the sunscreen on, and after I took them off, the tops of my feet ended up getting sizzled to a crisp like a steak Donald Trump would order.  The rest of me was fine.

  • On the eastbound leg of our journey we passed through a tiny settlement called Strawberry.  This made me think I had somehow made a navigational error when, on the return trip via what was supposed to be a different route, we again passed through a tiny settlement called Strawberry.  It didn’t look the same, but, like, is that even allowed?  Two places with the same name in the same state?  I know there’s a Brentwood in both Northern and Southern California, but the former is a city and the latter is just a neighborhood, right?  Anyway, I looked it up later, and sure enough, there is a Strawberry in El Dorado County and a different one in Tuolumne County.  But here’s the kicker.  The zip code for the former is 95735.  The zip code for the latter is… 95375.  So, uh, that wasn’t very well thought out, now was it?

  • Our unplanned detour to look at Lake Tahoe through a fence led to an even more unplanned detour through the state of Nevada.  Speaking of which: apparently the Vegas Golden Knights won the Stanley Cup this year.  But why are they the Golden Knights?  California is the Golden State.  Nevada is the Silver State.  They should be the Silver Knights, right?

  • Here’s an image I happened across:

    I have one of those.  It’s even blue like the one in the picture.  Mine lasted a month.  I tried making macaroni and cheese in it, and bits of it stuck to the inside and won’t come off.  Boo hiss to the Dutch oven, sez I.

  • Back in 2005 I had a weird experience on an airplane in which most of my vision remained normal, but text suddenly turned into a cloud of dots.  It lasted about half an hour.  Later I was told that it sounded like I’d had an “visual mi­graine without headache”, but my symptoms didn’t match what I read about that phenomenon.  However, this month I had an episode that was a perfect match!  You know how you have a blind spot where your optic nerve attaches to the retina⁠—but that instead of having an actual black spot in your visual field, your brain just fills in the gap so that you feel like you have a complete picture, but any detail that happens to fall onto that spot disappears?  Yeah, suddenly my field of view was full of blind spots.  It didn’t look like Swiss cheese, but suddenly there were just dozens of spots I couldn’t focus on.  And then the zigzag arrived.  Here’s a picture I found of what a visual migraine is supposed to look like:

    And, yep, that’s pretty much what it looked like!  And then after about half an hour things had gradually returned to normal.

  • When I started playing Wordle, it seemed to me that a good strategy would be to play the most common letters first.  The twelve most common letters in the English language are, famously, ETAOIN SHRDLU.  I looked at the top ten and discovered that ETAOINSHRD anagrams out to THOSE and DRAIN.  So I started using those as my first two words.  On 2022.0201, THOSE was the answer, so in hopes of getting another hole-in-one in the future, I switched the order so I play DRAIN first and THOSE second.

    Ellie has a similar strategy, except she plays HEART first and DISCO second.  This does leave the letter N unused, but still, she has 90% of the ten most common letters covered and gets to use two words she likes.  And hey!  On July 26, the answer was HEART!  Hole in one!

    That didn’t surprise me much.  I mean, it’s a common word.  It was going to be the answer one of these days.  What sur­prised me⁠—and freaked me the fuck out, quite frankly⁠—was that on July 27 the answer was DISCO.  Back to back days!  Wtf!  <insert “running around screaming” emoji here>

  • Hey, have you checked out my new name-tracking page?  One of the things I have learned in playing around with it is that there are a number of names that seem like homages to icons of 1960s culture that skyrocketed in popularity in the 2010s.  Take “Holden”, which was a very uncommon name from the beginning of American name records right up to 1985⁠—when suddenly its popularity shot upward, to the point that it was over a hundred times more popular in 2017 than in 1985.  The most famous Holden is of course Holden Caulfield from The Catcher in the Rye, a character with a Silent birth year, written by a G.I. author, whose book was beloved by countless Boomers… and reviled by most of my Gen-X classmates.  From what I’ve seen in teaching litera­ture for nearly thirty years now, J.D. Salinger has virtually no cachet among Millennials and Zoomers, and it seems safe to say that the popularity of Catcher does not mirror the popularity of the name Holden.  The name “Lennon” was 27 times as popular in 2016 as in 1998, and this does not reflect a growth in the popularity of the Beatles.  As for the name “Hendrix”⁠—that went from virtually unknown in the twen­tieth century to one that is now given to over a thousand American babies every year.  And yet Rick Beato felt com­pelled to make a video discussing “Why Jimi Hendrix Is Dis­appearing”, suggesting that the popularity of his surname as a given name does not parallel the trend of his own popu­larity.

    In recent years, the median age of an American woman giv­ing birth has been thirty.  That means that the parents giv­ing their children names like Holden, Lennon, and Hendrix are not the Boomers to whom these people were icons, nor even the Gen-Xers exposed to these people by our Boomer parents and teachers.  They’re Millennials, born in the 1980s and ’90s.  And I think I have a hypothesis to explain the pop­ularity of these names.  I don’t have kids, but since my teens I have had a list of names for any kids I might eventually have, names that are deeply meaningful to me.  In watching my friends name their kids, though, I have discovered that this is pretty rare.  Back in the late ’00s and early ’10s I was dumbstruck to find the expecting parents among my ac­quaintances asking for suggestions on Facebook, or going through lists of trendy names and picking out a couple they liked the sound of.  So my guess is this.  Every year since 1951, a tiny handful of Catcher superfans have named their children Holden.  Every year since 1963, a tiny handful of Beatles superfans have named their children Lennon.  Every year since 1967, a tiny handful of Jimi Hendrix superfans have named their children Hendrix.  And every year, parents have enrolled their kids in preschool and have heard the names of their classmates.  Ooh! “Ashley”! That’s beautiful! I think I’ll name my next daughter Ashley!  Or their friends have had kids and batted around some trendy names, and they’ve heard a couple they’ve wanted to poach.  “We were deciding between Olivia and Sophie, and eventually settled on Oliv­ia.”  Ooh, “Sophie”! Well, now I know what my daughter’s name is going to be!  So in 1970, some Jimi Hendrix superfans name their son “Hendrix” after the recently deceased guitar leg­end, and the other parents think, oof, not for me! I’m not that big a fan of “Purple Haze”!  But then a couple of gener­ations pass.  It’s 2006.  Some Jimi Hendrix superfans name their son “Hendrix” after the long-deceased guitar legend.  And the other parents think, ooh, I like the sound of that!  “Henry” is making a bit of a comeback, and names that end in the letter X are trendy, so maybe I’ll name my next kid Hendrix!  And they don’t worry about being pigeonholed as Jimi Hendrix superfans, because enough time has passed that they don’t know who he is.  That is, my guess is that now­adays, names like these become popular when the source of the name has become obscure enough for the name to be taken by prospective parents as a free-floating string of sounds and letters and not a reference to a character or a celebrity.

  • After Elon Musk re-branded Twitter as “X” (trendy!) I saw a bunch of people joke, “Ha ha! Not only did he pick a name whose trademark for social media belongs to Mark Zucker­berg, and a logo he can’t trademark because it’s just a char­acter from a font he doesn’t own, but everyone knows that ‘X’ is how you close an app! How appropriate!”  And, yeah, I thought, it’s true enough that you do close a window by clicking on an X.  Like, here’s a screenshot of the top right corner of a window on my screen:

    But that’s not really the same thing.  It’s on the right instead of the left, it’s in a big red box… it doesn’t actually have that much in common with the new Twitter logo.  And then I actually went to Twitter, and:

    …yeah, the new logo is a flat black X against a white back­ground in the top left corner of the main window, and to close out the window that pops up when you arrive, you… click the flat black X sitting against a white background in the top left corner of the pop-up window.  For fuck’s sake.


Here is an image I happened across a little while back:

In the past I have suggested that jokes can be ruined by excessive processing time⁠—for instance, if the joke appears in print and has a typo in the punch line, the split second that it takes for the reader’s brain to correct the error is enough to short-circuit the reaction that might lead that reader to laugh.  What struck me about the joke above is that I got it in extended slow motion and it still worked.  Here’s what I mean.

When I first saw it, I took the caption at face value.  “Oh, so the joke is that the driver of this trailer home had a date and so he… hopped out of the vehicle, I guess? And so the vehicle crashed and this trailer home ended up draped across the freeway? I don’t know that the caption really adds much…”

But something nagged at me.  Those words seemed vaguely fa­miliar to me, but I couldn’t place them.  “Brother’s got a date to keep, he can’t hang around”… there’s a rhythm to that… wait, are these lyrics?  Lyrics I’ve heard!  Somewhere!  Hang on⁠—not only does this line have a certain rhythm to it, but I know the rhythm!  Brother’s got a date to keep… can I summon up any more words along these lines?  Hang on, it’ll come to me.  Father wears his Sunday best… Mother’s tired, she needs a rest, the kids are play­ing up downstairs… Sister’s sighing in her sleep… Brother’s got a date to keep, he can’t hang around!  That’s it!  This is a reference!  A reference to… how does it go from there… “Our house!”  Yes!  It’s “Our House”, the Madness song from 1982!  I was never into Madness, but that song was popular enough that just about any Gen-Xer would get it.  Reference-based humor!  Enhanced by being a member of the group that would get the reference!

Except that still wasn’t the end of it.  What did the song have to do with the picture?  And that’s when, after a full minute of puzzling over this thing, I finally got it.  The chorus goes, “Our house / In the middle of our street”.  That line always seemed weird to me as a kid.  What’s a house doing in the middle of the street?  Don’t cars crash into it?  I figured that with a name like “Madness”, the band was trying to paint a picture of growing up in a wacky house smack dab in the middle of the asphalt with cars having to veer around it.  Because in the United States, that’s what “in the middle of the street” means.  You have a sidewalk on one side, a sidewalk on the other side, and if you’re in between those sidewalks, perhaps playing baseball with the other kids in the neighborhood as we did back when this song was on the radio, then you’re in the middle of the street.  It was only well into adulthood that I learned that, in Britain, where Madness is from and where the band is not a one-hit wonder, “in the middle of the street” actually means something else.  Appar­ently the idea is that there is a row of houses along the side of one block of a street, and the singer’s house is located in the center of that row.  Virtually no American would call that “the middle of a street”⁠—the U.S. equivalent would be something like “Our house / Midway down our block” or something like that.

And the picture above is of a very unlikely situation in which a house is, in fact, in the middle of a street, in the American sense.  Which in turn suggests that the caption writer is a Gen-X Ameri­can who was mystified by the British lyric as a kid exactly the way I was, and is playing on that dialectal difference.  British idioms, so odd to an American ear, are subtly positioned as butts of the joke.  And the caption does what the best observational comedians do: draw upon the shock of shared experience.  Gad­zooks!  That misunderstanding is absolutely part of my mental landscape, but I’ve never heard anyone else talk about it before!  Ha ha ha!  This is great!  And the fact that I didn’t get it immedi­ately didn’t diminish my enjoyment one bit⁠—in fact, the sense of having solved a fiendish puzzle made me enjoy the moment of finally getting the joke all the more.  And I have to think that the creator here was going for that delayed reaction!  It would have been easy enough to just make “Our house / In the middle of our street” the caption, after all.  Instead the caption is a lot more oblique.  It trades in a “heh” for a “stare - stare - stare - ha!

comment on
Tumblr
reply via
email
support
this site
return to the
Calendar page