|
Sparks are a band from Los Angeles that paved the way for a diverse
array of better‐known acts ranging from Queen (operatic vocals
and song structures) to the Cars (songs based around angular synth
lines) to Depeche Mode (took Sparks album #8 as their bible) to They
Might Be Giants (goofy song premises that appeal to nerds) to Green
Day (California band pretending to be British).
The band was formed in the late ’60s, under the name Halfnelson,
by a bunch of UCLA students: songwriter Ron Mael on keyboards, his
brother Russell on vocals, their friend Earle Mankey on guitar, and,
par for the course for bands starting out, a couple of different dudes
on drums.
Earle Mankey brought his brother James in to play bass, and having
attracted the attention of producer Todd Rundgren with a demo tape,
they soon recorded their first album:
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Roger” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Fa La Fa Lee” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Slowboat” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Biology 2” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Mr. Nice Guys”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Fletcher Honorama”
| |
|
|
| |
Halfnelson, 1971 (later
re-released as Sparks)
genre: experimental power pop
I knew before I started this project that Kimono My House
was generally considered Sparks’ breakthrough album, so I
wasn’t expecting much from this one.
In my experience, when a band comes to my attention with its second or
third record and I get all excited about checking out its first effort,
it turns out that there was a very good reason that the band hadn’t
come to my attention until its second or third record.
But while Halfnelson does have the thin sound
that tends to mark debut albums, it’s an impressive calling card
and a top-half Sparks album in its own right.
I've listed this as “experimental power pop”, and that means
two things.
First, some of the songs push the envelope all by
themselves—listen to the clip from
“Roger”, for
instance, which reminded me of something Cardiacs might have
done.
But it also foreshadows Sparks’ career by genre-hopping from
song to song, from the proto-New Wave of
“Fa La Fa Lee”
to the conventional “Slowboat”
(which could easily be a Neil Diamond song) to the very strange
“Biology 2” (presaging such
Nirvana songs as “Curmudgeon” and
“Oh, the Guilt”,
built around a short, sludgy riff) to the rockin’
“Mr. Nice Guys”.
Then there’s the big standout on the album, a slice of
concentrated gorgeousness called “Fletcher
Honorama” that sounds to me like the greatest song
George Harrison never wrote.
Album score:
18
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 11
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Girl from Germany”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Here Comes Bob” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Moon Over Kentucky”
| |
|
|
| |
A Woofer in Tweeter’s Clothing,
1972
genre: experimental power pop
A rare case of a Sparks album resembling its predecessor,
A Woofer in Tweeter’s Clothing differs
from Halfnelson primarily in its unevenness:
while Halfnelson is a solid album all the
way through, Woofer has some gems but also a
few clunkers (among them a cover of
“Do-Re-Mi” from
The Sound of Music).
We also see here the flowering of Ron Mael’s penchant for offbeat
song premises.
“Girl from Germany”, for
instance, is about a guy whose Teutonic ladyfriend
inadvertently gives his parents WWII flashbacks, while
“Here Comes Bob” is about a lonely
fellow who deliberately causes car accidents as a way to strike up
conversations—and is an odd composition to boot, heavy
on strings and sung in a pinched accent.
I’ve read that foremost among Sparks’ influences when they
were starting out were the Who, and while I can see the influence,
it’s not “My Generation” or
“I Can See for Miles” that spring
to mind, but the period when, in Pete Townshend’s words,
“the Who went slightly mad” and put out a record that I
consider in many ways the ultimate Who song,
“Dogs”:
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Dogs”
| |
|
|
But another similarity between Woofer and its
predecessor is that the best song is the one in which the band
dials down the wackiness and goes for something haunting, so the
third song on the left there is the atmospheric
“Moon Over Kentucky”.
Album score:
11
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 18
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“This Town Ain’t Big Enough for Both of Us”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Here in Heaven”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Hasta Mañana, Monsieur”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Thank God It’s Not Christmas”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Equator” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
| |
Kimono My House, 1974
genre: glam rock
Sparks had played to far larger audiences on its U.K. tour than it ever
had back home in L.A., so in 1973 Island Records
offered the Maels a deal to relocate to England… but just the
Maels.
After much thought, they accepted, leaving behind their guitarist,
bassist, and drummer—i.e., what in most circles would be
considered “an entire band”—and recruited new
ones on the other side of the pond.
This served notice as to where the band’s musical priorities lay:
yes, they might rock out on occasion, but henceforth the songs would be
built around Russell’s vocals and Ron’s lyrics,
melodies, and keyboard lines.
Their shows would also play off the contrast between Russell, with his
flowing mane and gaudy outfits, hyperactively bouncing around the
stage, and Ron, with his necktie, slicked-back hair, and
,
staring around unnervingly while remaining anchored to the spot.
For their first British release, Sparks set the genre‐hopping aside
and put out a record that was lush glam rock from start to finish.
The reaction in the U.K. was very positive, as the album went to
#4 and singles “This Town Ain’t Big Enough
for Both of Us” hit #2 and “Amateur
Hour” made it to #7.
In the U.S., Sparks remained almost entirely unknown and the album failed
to crack the top 100 (peaking at, yes, #101); even the signature
“This Town” went nowhere.
Kimono My House did become one of those records
whose influence outstrips their initial popularity, an example of the
old saw that only a few people bought it but everyone who did started a
band.
Kurt Cobain, for instance, cited it as one of his favorite albums of
all time, and one lesson he clearly learned was that you don’t
need intelligible lyrics to score a huge hit.
Russell Mael transformed the lengthy lyrics to
“This Town Ain’t Big Enough for Both of
Us” into a fusillade of
syllables that no one could follow without a cheat sheet, much as MTV
eventually started playing the “Smells Like Teen
Spirit” video with subtitles.
Now, this is fine by me—I generally don’t care about
lyrics, so long as they don’t actually make me cringe for
.
But what’s interesting is that the lyrics to these songs
aren’t at all generic—the amusing scenarios they
present are clearly meant to be a big part of the value listeners get
out of the songs.
Check out some of these premises:
“Here in Heaven”: a lament
from a boy whose girlfriend didn’t follow through on their
suicide pact.
“It is hell / Knowing that your health / Will keep you
out of here / For many many years”
“Hasta Mañana, Monsieur”:
Sparks’ take on the Beatles’
“Michelle”, as the language barrier
gets in the way of the singer’s attempt to court a foreign
lass.
“I tried to tell you in the night / That with a girl like
you I could do without guided tours / You tried to tell me
in the day / That your leading exports were textiles and iron
ore”
“Amateur Hour”: Here
it’s not the premise so much as the execution that merits
applause.
There’ve been lots of songs about adolescence and sexual
inexperience, but how many have summed up puberty with immortal lines
like “Girls grow tops to go topless in”?
“Thank God It’s Not
Christmas”: the holiday season is here, and our singer
is very glad Christmas itself hasn’t yet arrived because
it’s the one day he has to spend with his wife.
“Equator”: yes, this actually
is about a guy freaking out because he has gone to the equator to
rendezvous with his crush, only to realize that she never did give him
a longitude.
It’s a delightful assortment, but would have been entirely lost
on me without the services of the lyrics sites.
Take “Equator”, for instance: by the
time he gets to “Surely we said it was 3 p.m. /
Surely we said it was March the 10th”,
Russell has reached a vocal range that only bats can hear.
Which isn’t a criticism—it’s actually
kind of awesome when he hits those notes.
But if we’re supposed to catch the words without already knowing
what they are… not so much.
In any case, though the brilliance does peter out a bit toward the end,
this is a great record and is frequently cited as the album to pick up
if you’re only going to get one (a conundrum that was much more
common back in the CD era, I guess).
Album score:
27
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 6
|
| |
Propaganda, 1974
genre: experimental glam rock
Amazingly, Sparks weren’t even done with 1974, as they put out
yet another album before the year was up—and this is the
one about which my opinion has changed the most since my last
update.
I’d described Propaganda as a step
downward on the path from the triumph of Kimono
to the weirdness of Indiscreet that would
follow in ’75, but these days I like this second ’74
album even more than the first.
It’s anchored by what are probably the two best Sparks songs of
the ’70s, the raucous “Don’t Leave
Me Alone with Her” and the gentle
“Never Turn Your Back on Mother
Earth”, but every song leading up to that pair is an
immediate must-listen when I’m shuffling through my music drive
in the car.
There are other strong contenders for Sparks’ second-best
album, but this is currently the one I have in that spot.
Album score:
32
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 2
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Pineapple”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Hospitality on Parade”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“In the Future” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Looks, Looks, Looks” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Get in the Swing” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
| |
Indiscreet, 1975
genre: eclectic
I don’t think I can do a better job explaining how strange this
album is than simply by having you listen to
“Pineapple” over on the left
there.
Unfortunately, your album has to count as a bit of a misfire when the
silly song about fruit is one of the best tracks on it.
There are a couple of better ones, like
“Hospitality on Parade” (great live,
and a highlight of the
Sparks concert I went to in 2017) and “Happy
Hunting Ground” (about a guy who, in the immortal words
of John Allison, “can’t deal with a world where girls
aren’t 19”).
I also like the herky-jerky “In the
Future”.
But a lot of these songs are early-20th-century pastiches;
“Looks, Looks, Looks” and
“Get in the Swing” aren’t
terrible, but some tracks don’t work out even that well.
That being the case, I guess it’s kind of lucky that none of the
Sparks albums from 1975 to 1979 bear the slightest resemblance to one
another…
Album score:
1
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 24
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Nothing to Do”
| |
|
|
| |
Big Beat, 1976
genre: arena rock
Between Indiscreet and Big Beat, the Maels
decided that glam rock had run its course and returned to the U.S., once
again recruiting an all new backing band.
They then proceeded to upset their British fans by completely changing
their sound.
It was 1976, KISS was all the rage, the Ramones
had attracted a fair amount of buzz in New York, and Sparks accordingly
whipped up an album’s worth of big dumb rock.
Gone was Russell’s trademark falsetto.
Gone were the eccentric lyrics, replaced by parodic versions of big dumb
rock lyrics, e.g., “You fell for me, I fell for you / You think
I’m great, I think you’re good / And that’s enough
to prove the point once more / Everybody’s stupid, that’s
for sure” (followed by endless repetitions of
“Everybody’s stupid, that’s for sure / Oh
yeah!”).
And gone, sadly, were most of the hooks.
See, by all rights this ought to be one of my favorite Sparks
records.
As big a Sparks fan as I have become, my real favorite bands are outfits
like Die Mannequin and Jack Off Jill that can blow your speakers
out.
There is one awesome song on Big Beat,
“Nothing to Do”—so
Ramonesy that Joey Ramone tried to convince the others to cover
it—but its awesomeness lies in elements that
aren’t Sparks’ traditional strengths: above all else,
it’s the four long, jaw-dropping drum fills that lead into the
choruses, with second place going to the bass part.
If you could take the genius of “Nothing to
Do”’s rhythm section and marry it to the hooks
of the 1974 songs, you’d really have something… but
instead the rawwk mostly goes to waste on songs that are, sadly,
quite dull.
Album score:
4
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 22
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Ladies” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
“Occupation” (the video is an edit)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Goofing Off”
| |
|
|
| |
Introducing Sparks, 1977
genre: Beach Boys
With the arena rock sound having turned out to be a flop, Sparks switched
directions yet again and came back with a shimmery bubblegum record in
which the Mael brothers pay unmistakable homage to their fellow
Southern Californians, the Wilson brothers.
The pastiche goes right down to the accent Russell uses: after years of
pretending to be British, listen to how hard he hits those r’s on
the chorus of “Ladies”.
Of course, this wouldn’t be Sparks if they didn’t subvert
things in some way, so a song like “Over the
Summer” is about how summer is awesome not because of
the surfing but because the girl the singer has a crush on grew breasts
during it.
The six Beach Boys homages/parodies (including a standout track called
“Occupation”, a guilty pleasure if
there ever was one) bracket three interesting songs that show off
Sparks’ diversity: the stark rocker
“I’m Not”; a song called
“Forever Young” that skewers every
other song that’s expressed that sentiment (“I just refuse
to be what I’m not this instant”); and
“Goofing Off”, which takes
banal lyrics about how great weekends are and marries them to a
frickin’ Cossack dance, throwing in some of the best guitar
work ever to appear on a Sparks record.
Album score:
14
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 14
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Academy Award Performance”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“My Other Voice”
| |
|
|
| |
No. 1 in Heaven, 1979
genre: electronic disco
Yes, it was quite a shock for fans of the glam-rock Sparks to pick
up Big Beat.
And those who got into Sparks by hearing tracks from
Big Beat in the movie
Rollercoaster were nonplussed by the shift to
close harmonies.
But nothing in Sparks’ career can match the whiplash between the
end of their seventh record and the beginning of their eighth:
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Those Mysteries” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Tryouts for the Human Race”
| |
|
|
In between those two records, Sparks had decamped to Germany to team up
with producer Giorgio Moroder, who had pioneered what would become
the sound of the ’80s and who would go on to write or co-write
such hits as Blondie’s “Call
Me”, Irene Cara’s
“Flashdance”, and
Berlin’s “Take My Breath
Away”.
This time the Maels didn’t need to find a new guitarist when they
switched continents, because there were no guitars: the instrumentation
on the new album would consist entirely of synthesizers and
drums.
With an average song length of over five and a half minutes, they could
only squeeze six songs onto the entire album—six songs
with Russell’s falsetto back again and swooping through a lush
sonic landscape.
As far as the British public was concerned, this was Sparks’ big
comeback album, and it spawned three successful singles—all
radio edits, as nearly all Sparks singles would be from this point
on.
This is one of the areas where Sparks and I are at odds: I think that
in general the optimal length for a pop song is two minutes flat,
and while there are songs that need to clock in at six, Sparks’
songs don’t usually qualify.
They’re way too long.
Thus it stands to reason that, while I think all six songs on this
record are quite good, I like the shorter ones the most: I already
talked about “Beat the Clock” in
the introduction to this article, but just as good are
“Academy Award Performance” and
“My Other Voice”, which presages
Björk’s Homogenic by
eighteen years.
(And, yes, “Tryouts for the Human Race” is about sperm.)
Album score:
30
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 3
|
|
|
|
|---|
“When I’m With You” (the video is an edit)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“The Greatest Show on Earth”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Stereo” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
| |
Terminal Jive, 1980
genre: early ’80s adult contemporary
And now we’ve reached the album with far and away Sparks’
biggest hit, “When I’m With
You”, which was #1 for six weeks… in France.
It was their only hit in France, placing Sparks among the biggest
one-hit wonders in French history: « Toute ma
jeunesse ! » sigh the sixty‐year‐old French
commenters on Youtube.
It also did virtually nothing else anywhere.
I don’t know why—it’s not like the French were
ready for an avant-garde piece that the rest of the world wasn’t,
because this is one of Sparks’ less challenging tracks.
It’s got a tune that one can easily imagine playing on the easy
listening station, livened up by a catchy synth line that snakes
through the whole song.
The same holds true of the album in general, or at least the second
half (the rest of the first half is eminently skippable).
The songs are very much middle-of-the-road affairs but, like
“When I’m With You”, goosed by
a bit of synth and made reasonably catchy.
You’ve got “The Greatest Show on
Earth”, probably the second-best song on the record;
“Noisy Boys”, paving the way for
Wham!; and “Stereo”, suggesting
the three new wave albums to come.
Album score:
10
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 19
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Tips for Teens”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Where’s My Girl”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“That’s Not Nastassia”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Wacky Women” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
| |
Whomp That Sucker, 1981
genre: new wave
Whomp That Sucker is the closest Sparks would
come to their experimental power pop period for a while.
It’s one of Sparks’ three new wave albums, but each of
those records is a little different.
This one has a sparer sound than the next two, which may be why it
reminds me of the band’s pre-Kimono
stuff even though the next album has even more of the diversity that
made Halfnelson and
Woofer such grab bags.
Whomp is also distinguished by its deliberately
shrill chorus of backup vocals (check out “Tips
for Teens” and “Where’s My
Girl”).
This was the first Sparks record to sell better in the U.S. than
anywhere else, and there’s a reason for that.
In 1981, there was a radio station in Los Angeles that was looking
for bands, especially L.A. bands, that played a distinctly ’80s
style of music and that hadn’t yet made the big time, so the
listeners could feel like they were tuned in to something underground,
alternative, cutting-edge… even as they and everyone else
on their block plastered their cars’ bumpers with these stickers:
KROQ put Whomp That Sucker into its rotation,
and while that wasn’t enough to break Sparks outside of L.A. in
1981, it did bring them to the attention of radio and TV people who
kept their eyes peeled for their next release…
Album score:
18
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 10
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“I Predict”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Nicotina”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Eaten by the Monster of Love”
| |
|
|
| |
Angst in My Pants, 1982
genre: new wave
Nearly a decade after making it big in the U.K., Sparks finally made a
splash in the U.S.—enough of a splash to end up on
Saturday Night Live, at least:
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Mickey Mouse” (live)
| |
|
|
The big single off Angst in My Pants was
“I Predict”, which was basically a
novelty song, mocking the tabloids: “Lassie will prove that Elvis
and her had a fleeting affair” and suchlike.
(Weird Al Yankovic did the same sort of thing a couple of years later
with “Midnight Star”.)
In fact, the whole album is basically a string of joke songs about
silly stuff, from the title track (about unwanted erections) to
“Nicotina” (the best song musically,
despite being about a sentient cigarette) to
“Moustache” (in which Ron goes on
the record about his toothbrush mustache, which he would soon ditch at
long last).
But set aside the goofy lyrical content and you’ve got a
satisfying slice of pure new wave, if that’s what you’re
in the mood for.
The consensus is that this is the best of the three new wave records,
and for fifteen years my contrarian vote was for
Whomp, but with this update I’m joining
the crowd.
The album closes with an uncharacteristic but still very catchy song
called “Eaten by the Monster of
Love”, sung in the voice of a defiant eight-year-old
boy from the back woods, that also appeared on the soundtrack to the
movie Valley Girl, and apparently
that is therefore the one Sparks song a lot of
people know.
And we’re not even close to the end of the list of “the one
Sparks song a lot of people know”!
Album score:
23
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 8
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Cool Places”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Popularity”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
“All You Ever Think About Is Sex” (the video is an edit)
| |
|
|
| |
In Outer Space, 1983
genre: new wave dance
Sparks’ popularity peaked in the U.S. with this one, which
reached #88 and whose big single, “Cool
Places”, went all the way to #49—thanks
in large part to guest vocals by Russell Mael’s girlfriend at
the time, Jane Wiedlin of the Go-Go’s.
(They had joined forces, Russell told Dick Clark on
American Bandstand, out of “mutual
admiration for each other’s respective groups, and then…
mutual admiration for each other’s… bodies”.)
The rest of the album revolves around the same theme, relating
satirical tales of characters in search of coolness, popularity, and
hedonism—obsessions of the ’80s to go with the
sounds of the ’80s.
(“Prayin’ for a Party” has a
big dumb guitar riff that sounds like a parody of Joan Jett, and
“All You Ever Think About Is Sex” is
Sparks in Depeche Mode, uh, mode.)
This is still a new wave album, but as noted, it’s a different
species of new wave from the others.
While Angst in My Pants and (especially)
Whomp that Sucker feature a staccato
boom-clack-boom-clack beat, stark production, and synth and guitar
lines that are alternately searing and jerky, sometimes with synth
washes in the background, In Outer Space
substitutes busy sequenced patterns.
Listen to the “dee dee doo doo dee dee doo” that runs
through “Popularity”, for
example… and get used to it, because Sparks wouldn’t
drop it for nearly twenty years.
Album score:
9
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 20
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Pulling Rabbits Out of a Hat”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“With All My Might”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Progress” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
| |
Pulling Rabbits Out of a Hat, 1984
genre: mid‐’80s synthpop
The first time I listened to Pulling Rabbits Out of
a Hat,
happened to be in the next room, and I had to ask: “Is it just
me, or did that kind of suck?”
The first song, which was the title track, I liked a
lot—between this and
“Nicotina”, it seems clear that I
tend to go for each record’s most
offering.
But as for the rest of the album… if you tuned to some backwater
cable channel that was showing some forgotten ’80s movie, this
utterly generic synthpop is what you’d hear on the soundtrack.
My opinion is no longer so negative—after the songs had a
chance to grow on me, they no longer sounded quite so generic.
I would go so far as to call some of them pretty darn good
’80s synthpop.
“With All My Might”, the first
single, would have been a splendid addition to my sixth-grade
graduation party, and “Progress”
sounds a bit like an off-brand version of Prince’s
“I Would Die 4 U”,
which I liked at the time.
I later had to ask Lizzie, “Is it just me, or was that kind of
good?”
Album score:
15
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 13
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Music That You Can Dance To” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Modesty Plays” (1986 version)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Shopping Mall of Love” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
| |
Music That You Can Dance To,
1986
genre: club
As mentioned, there are quite a few songs in Sparks’ catalogue
that a lot of people cite as the one Sparks song they know, so
let’s throw one more onto the heap.
“Music That You Can Dance To”, the
title track from this album, went higher than another other Sparks
song went on a U.S. chart… #6, on the club
play chart.
Sigh.
Sparks do love to genre-hop, and it was only a matter of time before
they landed in a genre I dislike.
So far they’ve managed to largely avoid rap and country, at
least.
This album isn’t completely without merit.
“Modesty Plays”, a bombastic
reworking of their 1982 theme song for a Modesty Blaise TV show
that never got produced, is okay.
And “Shopping Mall of Love”, piling
samples on top of each other to make a dissonant, minimalist sonic
collage, hints at the turn Sparks would make in the twenty-first
century.
But we’re still at 1986, so that’s a fair way off…
Album score:
–9
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 26
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“So Important”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Love‐O‐Rama” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“A Walk Down Memory Lane” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Stop Me If You’ve Heard This Before” (excerpt)
| |
|
|
| |
Interior Design, 1988
genre: late ’80s synthpop
Same story as Rabbits, only moreso.
At least Rabbits was an artifact of
1984, about whose music I was occasionally
nostalgic; Interior Design is from
1988, whose music made me listen to Led
Zeppelin instead.
The first few times I listened to this I was sure that I could mark it
in as the worst Sparks album.
And yet, again like Rabbits, it wound up
growing on me somehow!
Someone on Youtube posted an “animated history of
Sparks” video with a sample song from each
album—except for this one, as apparently the author
hated it enough to swap in a
song Sparks had donated to a French band called Les Rita
Mitsouko.
Me, I found plenty of tracks that seemed worth at least an excerpt, as
the links on the left there show.
Album score:
7
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 21
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Let’s Go Surfing”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
“When Do I Get to Sing ‘My Way’”
(the video is an edit)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
“I Hear Charlie Parker Playing”
(the video is an edit)
| |
|
|
| |
Gratuitous Sax & Senseless Violins, 1994
genre: Eurodance
After releasing fifteen albums in less than eighteen years, Sparks took
their first extended break from that particular grind, working instead
on a musical adaptation of a Japanese comic called
Mai, the Psychic Girl.
(This came to nothing, though it did turn Sparks into a trio for a few
years, as Star Trek actress
,
who would have played Mai, joined the band on electronic drums.
She was a big player in their videos during this period—check
’em out!)
Sparks were out of action from 1989 to 1993, which just so happens to
coincide with the period that Nirvana was putting out records.
Too bad—I would have liked to have heard the Sparks grunge
album.
Instead, when Sparks did return, it was with a ’90s update of the
club music they turned out in Music That You Can Dance
To, with a rapid beat added that was presaged in
Outer Space.
This was a sound that was out of fashion in the U.S., but big in
Europe—specifically, big in Germany, where Sparks wound up
#1 in airplay for all of 1994 with “When Do I Get
to Sing ‘My Way’”.
The follow-up was “I Hear Charlie Parker
Playing”, and, man, listening to it you can just see the
Roxbury guys nodding their heads in unison.
This is just not a sound I’m into.
And yet!
At the end of this record is the best Sparks song ever,
“Let’s Go Surfing”, and it
doesn’t actually sound all that different from the rest of the
album.
Music—who can figger it?
Gratuitous Sax was also billed as Sparks’
comeback in the U.K., where interviewers blithely asked the Maels what
they’d been up to since—no, not since
Interior Design.
Since “Beat the Clock”.
Their usual answer was “getting heard of in the U.S.”
(I guess that sounds more impressive than “becoming one-hit
wonders in France”.)
Album score:
12
(without “Let’s Go Surfing”: 0)
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 17
|
|
|
|
|---|
“Pulling Rabbits Out of a Hat”
(1997, excerpt)
| |
|
|
| |
Plagiarism, 1997
genre: remixes
By 1997 Sparks had been putting out music for over a quarter of a
century.
They had American fans unfamiliar with their ’70s work,
British fans unfamiliar with their ’80s work, and German fans
unfamiliar with both.
The obvious solution would be a best‐of album, but the Maels
decided to tweak the concept a bit.
Instead of simply compiling their greatest hits, they remade them,
sometimes bringing in bands they’d influenced (Faith No More,
Erasure) as collaborators.
I’m not going to rank this album—it’s too
weird a case.
In a sense, it could be #1, because it’s
got a lot of Sparks’ best songs all in one place… but it
could just as easily be at the bottom, because in every case, I’d
rather listen to the original song than the remake.
So since I’ve got the originals, why bother with this album at
all?
As a representative clip I’ll put up a chunk of the orchestral
remake of “Rabbits”, just because
it’ll be important later.
Rank among Sparks albums:
N/A
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“My Baby’s Taking Me Home”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Ugly Guys with Beautiful Girls”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Suburban Homeboy”
| |
|
|
| |
Lil’ Beethoven, 2002
genre: minimalist chamber pop
Sparks’ big swerve away from techno wasn’t quite as sharp a
break as the one between Introducing Sparks and
No. 1 in Heaven.
Minimalism had been part of their repertoire as far back as
“Shopping Mall of Love”.
Classical orchestration had shown up on
Plagiarism.
Still, it seems unlikely that anyone anticipated that Sparks’
next move after Balls would be to pack up the
electronica that had dominated their music since 1979 and break
out the pianos and violins.
Seriously, imagine that you’ve been a fan of Sparks since
hearing them at your favorite Berlin discotheque eight years ago, or
watching them on MTV in your family room in Pacific Palisades nineteen
years ago, or catching their show in London twenty-eight years
ago, and you put on their new record, and the first thing you hear is
this:
|
|
|
|---|
“The Rhythm Thief” (the video is an edit)
| |
|
|
And then it turns out that this track is no outlier; pretty much the
whole record consists of Russell repeating the same phrases over an
orchestral backing track.
“My Baby’s Taking Me Home”
takes this to extremes, repeating the title dozens upon dozens of
times and using no other words other than a short spoken-word
piece—and yet it works!
I can’t agree with critics who called Lil’
Beethoven a masterpiece—the songs are generally too
long, and some of those in the first half aren’t particularly
interesting.
The same sort of thing can be said about Sparks’ other albums of
the 2000s: they’re uneven, often quite flabby… but studded
with gems.
On this one, take “Ugly Guys with Beautiful
Girls”, one of my favorites in the Sparks catalogue.
It’s—wait, you know what?
I don’t want to spoil it, any more than I’d want to spoil
its spiritual cousin, R.E.M.’s
“Leave”.
Just make sure you listen at least up to the 45-second mark.
Like I said in the introduction, I find this constant reinvention
really fascinating.
It is something that this band has gathered a new following on five
occasions: Britain in 1974, France in 1980, the U.S. in 1982-3, Germany
in 1994, and with Lil’ Beethoven in 2002,
the Internet.
When I first mentioned that I’d started listening to Sparks,
people online messaged and tweeted me about them, and this was always
the record they mentioned.
How many bands can say they won a new generation of fans with their
nineteenth album?
While I’m here, I want to say something about the concluding
track, “Suburban Homeboy”.
It’s one of the better songs on the album.
Yet the lyrics (“I am a suburban homeboy and I say ‘Yo,
dogg’ to my pool-cleaning guy”) aren’t exactly
groundbreaking comedy.
They’re pretty standard Weird Al fare.
Frickin’ P.D.Q. Bach had done something pretty similar over a
decade earlier.
(Ugh.)
But there’s a key difference.
See, Weird Al and P.D.Q. Bach and other Dr. Demento regulars
are careful to enunciate, because the jokes are the whole point of the
song.
Russell Mael doesn’t.
As with the songs on Kimono, the words are just
about impossible to make out without a lyric sheet.
But it doesn’t matter.
The strength of the song lies in the catchy melody and
instrumentation.
That’s what makes it good despite the fact that the central joke
is pretty tired.
When I first said that I’d be doing a Sparks writeup, I got a few
replies from people saying that they were looking forward to reading
what I thought of this theme and that theme, and I’m afraid the
answer was that I didn’t think much of anything because I
don’t pay much attention to lyrics.
What I have trapped in my head after listening to these songs, or any
songs, is basically, “La, la da da‐da da DA da, la da da
da‐da dah dee dah, la da dee dee dah…”
(Or “My baby’s taking me home, my baby’s taking me
home, my baby’s taking me home…”)
Album score:
21
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 9
|
|
|
|
|---|
“Dick Around”
(the video is an edit)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
“Perfume”
(the video is an edit)
| |
|
|
| |
Hello Young Lovers, 2006
genre: chamber pop/rock
Another winner, as Sparks took the guitars that had come as a surprise
on “Ugly Guys with Beautiful Girls”
and applied them more liberally to their second chamber pop
effort.
The first track, “Dick Around”, is
basically a complete rock opera compressed into six and a half
minutes… yet much as I love it, I’m partial to the edit
that appears in the video, which cuts out some of the slower sections
and goes straight for the rock.
And to watch those rock sections—Dean Menta and Steve
McDonald shredding on guitar and bass, Ron Mael and ’00s Sparks
drummer
pounding away at their respective instruments, Russell plowing
through the lyrics in inimitable fashion… man, why don't they
write more songs in which they just rock
out?
For it is awesome when they do.
That said, even the less rock-oriented songs on this record
aren’t bad… but again, the album as a whole would jump
up these rankings if only the radio edits had been used (and if those
songs without radio edits had received them).
This is probably the best example in the Sparks catalogue of the
phenomenon I mentioned earlier: it’s a collection of great
ideas for two-minute songs that have been stretched out to five
minutes or more.
Album score:
17
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 12
|
|
|
|
|---|
“Lighten Up, Morrissey”
(the video is an edit)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Good Morning”
| |
|
|
| |
Exotic Creatures of the Deep,
2008
genre: chamber pop/rock
This is a pretty solid album all the way through, though as with its
’00s predecessors, it’s a bit flabby;
even the best songs tend to be one musical idea repeated for over
four minutes when two would have sufficed.
The highlights are “Lighten Up,
Morrissey”, about a guy who’s frustrated because
he’s dating a Morrissey fangirl who thinks that her current
beau doesn’t measure up to her icon, and “Good
Morning”, sung entirely in the falsetto that Russell can
somehow still summon even as he approaches eighty.
Album score:
14
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 15
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Mr. Bergman, How Are You?”
| |
|
|
| |
The Seduction of Ingmar Bergman,
2009
genre: radio musical
This was the album that wrapped up the 2011 edition of this article,
and it was a downbeat coda, because this is Sparks’ worst album
of new material.
Sparks had been contacted by Sweden’s national radio network,
which wanted to commission a musical from them; they had free rein,
with one stipulation: the result had to have something to do with
Sweden.
The Maels, both of whom had studied film back at UCLA, selected Ingmar
Bergman as their subject, setting forth a tale of the dour director
being courted by Hollywood.
Pete Townshend always said of his rock operas that anyone could write
the opera part, but the trick was writing the rock songs to go with
it.
The Seduction of Ingmar Bergman barely has any
songs at all; it’s mostly shapeless film-score music with some
vocals on top, some sung, some spoken.
Half the vocals are in Swedish.
Russell Mael barely appears.
His one big song is the highlight of the album, so naturally
that’s what I’ve attached.
Don’t get your hopes up; it’s not characteristic.
(That said, the eye-poppingly low album score is overstated: because
of the way these album scores are calculated, having a bunch of very
short boring tracks, like Seduction does,
hurts more than having a few long ones.
Also, I didn’t discover until the 2026 update that an English
version had come out a few months after the official release, and
that does keep some of the interstitial tracks from being totally
wasted on an anglophone listener.)
Album score:
–25 (English version: –14)
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 27
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Two Hands One Mouth”
| |
|
|
| |
Two Hands One Mouth, 2013
genre: unplugged
This was the first Sparks album to come out after I posted the first
edition of this article: a set of recordings from their
Two Hands One Mouth concert tour.
The idea behind the tour, as the title suggests, was to perform a bunch
of their back catalogue without a band, just Russell on vocals with Ron
on keyboards.
I was disappointed, but it made sense: the Maels were now pushing
seventy and it was logical that if they were going to keep performing
they’d downshift into that “Eric Clapton playing
‘Layla’ half-speed on an acoustic
guitar” mode.
So, another N/A because this isn’t new material (except for the
one song linked alongside this paragraph), but if I were going to rank
this one, it’d be at the bottom.
Rank among Sparks albums:
N/A
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Johnny Delusional”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Call Girl”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“So Many Bridges” (Sparks‐only demo)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Collaborations Don’t Work”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Things I Won’t Get”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Look at Me”
| |
|
|
| |
FFS, 2015
genre: art rock
And then just as I’d concluded that Sparks would spend the rest
of their career doing dentist’s office versions of their old
songs, they teamed up with a rock band, Franz Ferdinand, and made the
best album they’d released since the ’70s.
Gadzooks!
The first edition of this article called
Lil’ Beethoven and its two follow-ups a
revival for Sparks, but in all honesty, what that meant was that those
albums are listenable all the way through and have at least a couple of
really good songs apiece.
For this one, I was able to find half a dozen songs that seemed worth
linking up—and you gotta watch the first video
(“Johnny Delusional”) at the
very least, for it is awesome.
Of course, in saying this, I couldn’t help but wonder, did this
mean that Sparks suddenly found yet another gear in the mid-2010s, or
did it just mean that I liked Franz Ferdinand and hadn’t
known it?
That was hard to answer in 2015, but I could say that this certainly
sounds like a late-period Sparks record: the lyrics are
indistinguishable from the rest of their work, the
genre-hopping within the album is distinctive, and there’s
even one of their seven-minute suites lurking at the end in
“Collaborations Don’t
Work”.
So, yeah, FFS feels like Sparks with a kickin’ new backing band
and not some altogether new entity—and I would soon have
my question about whether Sparks had found a new gear answered.
(A note about the score: normally when a “deluxe” version
of an album is released with some extra tracks, I don’t count
it as the primary version—but in this case the deluxe
and standard versions were both released on the same day, and in fact
the deluxe version with its four extra songs was the
only version released in the U.S.
So that’s the one I’m counting as primary.)
Album score:
29
(standard version: 23)
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 5
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“So Tell Me Mrs. Lincoln Aside from That How Was the Play?”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
“Edith Piaf” (the video is an edit)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Giddy Giddy”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Unaware”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Hippopotamus”
| |
|
|
| |
Hippopotamus, 2017
genre: eclectic pop/rock
This is the best Sparks album.
Think about that.
Sparks’ first album, Halfnelson, came out
in 1971.
Imagine that you’re in a band that just put out its first album
this year.
(It’s 2026 as I type this.)
Now imagine learning that your band’s
best album will come out in the year
2072.
That’s what Sparks achieved with
Hippopotamus.
Maybe it’s a matter of having waited so long to put out a
proper Sparks album, having spent the time since
Exotic Creatures on a supergroup, a live
record, and two musicals (including the original version of
Annette, discussed below).
If you put the best fifteen songs from the three Sparks albums during
the Dubya administration together, it actually beats this one
out.
But instead those songs out were spread out over three albums that were
larded with filler.
Hippopotamus has the least filler of any
Sparks album since No. 1 in Heaven.
It is great song after great song.
There is quite a bit of genre-hopping on this record, from the
drum-and-bass of “Giddy Giddy” to
the Bowie-esque “Unaware” to the
accordion-heavy “When You’re a French
Director” to the title track, which is Sparks’
answer to “Yellow
Submarine”—but unlike
Indiscreet,
which frequently wandered off into the land of the unlistenable,
Hippopotamus stays within the broad confines
of pop/rock, with the exception of the straight-ahead opera of
“Life with the Macbeths”,
which turns out to be one of the record’s standout
tracks.
And while many reviews have chuckled at the length of the title
of the song “So Tell Me Mrs. Lincoln
Aside from That How Was the Play?”, few
have pointed out that that one’s even better, a rocker with a
killer hook.
So, yeah.
I ended the 2011 edition of this article wishing that I could end on an
upbeat note.
In 2017 I could, thanks to a septuagenarian and his little brother
topping every album that made up the original 22-album list.
And then something remarkable happened…
Album score:
43
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 1
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“iPhone”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Self-Effacing”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“All That”
| |
|
|
| |
A Steady Drip, Drip, Drip, 2020
genre: eclectic pop/rock
…Recall that Gratuitous Sax & Senseless
Violins had been billed as Sparks’ comeback album in the
United Kingdom.
Its peak position on the British charts?
#150.
Hello Young Lovers was the next Sparks album to
chart; it went to #66.
And Exotic Creatures of the Deep topped out at
#54.
These are numbers about which you break out the euphemisms and say,
“Ah, a cult success!”
And then, out of nowhere, with no charting singles, no movie yet, no
nothin’, Hippopotamus went to number
seven.
Maybe it was the Franz Ferdinand fans crossing over.
Maybe it was the return to pop/rock after years of chamber pop and
showtunes.
Maybe Sparks’ new label, BMG, had something to do with it.
Maybe the music industry and culture had changed to the point that
a small but dedicated following could take a record further up the
charts than before, the way that the top-rated prime time TV show today
would have finished dead last less than forty years ago.
Whatever it was, as the calendar ticked over to the 2020s, the Maels
found themselves in a position they hadn’t been in for a couple
of generations: commercially relevant in a major country.
So would their follow-up build on this success or would it flop?
And would it continue in the same vein or would Sparks switch up its
music as it had so many times before?
As it turned out, A Steady Drip, Drip, Drip
went to… number seven!
Again!
And it is more of the same, though to me, not as good—it
felt kind of like, okay, here are the songs we had left over after we
used the best ones on Hippopotamus.
For quite a while I found it a real letdown, but it has grown on me
over the years, to the point that I see that I now have it in my top
quarter.
Meaning that four of my seven favorite Sparks albums were
released when Ron Mael was in his seventies.
As someone with a bunch of big projects on my to-do list that I
have despaired of ever finishing, I’ve found some genuine
inspiration in this.
Album score:
24
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 7
|
|
|
|
|---|
“Baby Aria” (ft. Hebe Griffiths)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
“We Love Each Other So Much” (ft. Adam Driver
and Marion Cotillard)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
“Too Operatic” (ft. Rebecca Sjöwall)
| |
|
|
| |
Annette, 2021
genre: movie musical
Sparks’ late-career resurgence took them to new heights in
2021.
Their movie with Jacques Tati, Confusion,
never got made.
Their movie with Tim Burton, Mai, the Psychic
Girl, never got made.
But their movie with Leos Carax, Annette,
got made, and it won them a César.
My article about the film is here.
But this page isn’t about movies; it’s about albums.
Accompanying Annette when it hit the
theaters in July was a soundtrack album.
That’s the one I’ve put in the usual spot over to the left
there.
But it only contains a curated selection of the movie’s
songs.
In December, Sparks released an
“unlimited edition” with
all the movie’s music, including the highlight, the
“Baby Aria” sung by
of the London Youth Choir.
But the fact that she is not a Mael brings up a crucial point:
neither of these versions of the soundtrack album is
really a Sparks record.
The songs are performed by the film actors, who often seem to be
fighting against the melodies in order to make sure the emotional
inflections they’re trying to convey get through.
And as I lament in my article about the film, Adam Driver in
particular is not in the same universe as Russell Mael as a
singer.
But that would be a too-bad-so-sad situation, except…
…in 2024, Sparks released the original recordings of
Annette that they’d made in 2013, back
when they expected that this would be a stand-alone album, meant
as a follow-up to The Seduction of
Ingmar Bergman.
And this absolutely is a Sparks album.
It does tell a story, but amid the narrative mortar are well over a
dozen real songs that showcase the voices of Russell Mael and
the unofficial third Spark of this era, opera singer
.
So that’s the one I should be ranking.
But where do I put it?
2013?
2024?
And do I just ignore the actual movie soundtracks?
Argh, confusing.
I—
—wait, you know what?
I changed my mind while writing the paragraph above.
I was about to say that, nah, the July soundtrack album is the
primary version of Annette, so that’s
the one I’m going to rank.
But I talked myself into a different choice.
The 2013 opera is the one that’s actually a Sparks album.
I’ll keep it here, because it makes the most sense to stick all
things Annette in the 2021 spot.
But with apologies to Miss Griffiths, that’s the one that makes
the most sense to put in a list titled “29+ albums by
Sparks”.
Album score:
2 (“Cannes” –3, “unlimited” 2)
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 23
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Nothing Is as Good as They Say It Is”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“We Go Dancing”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“The Girl Is Crying in Her Latte”
| |
|
|
| |
The Girl Is Crying in Her
Latte, 2023
genre: minimalist pop/rock
The critical success of Annette
didn’t tempt Sparks to plunge back into making musicals.
The Girl Is Crying in Her Latte saw Sparks
return to the art pop/rock they’d been doing since the
mid-2010s, though this time the minimalism was added to the mix
with a heavier hand.
One of the main things I loved about the computer game
Civilization IV is that what it terms
“the modern era” is largely scored to the work of
minimalist composer John Adams, and yeah, “We
Go Dancing” would have fit in very nicely.
And I mean that as high praise.
Yet that’s not even the best song on this album!
“Nothing Is as Good as They Say It
Is” would be a must-include on any “best of
Sparks” compilation, and again, it’s hard to overstate
how remarkable that is.
Because that song would be sharing that best-of record with
“Fletcher Honorama” from
fifty-two years earlier.
And on the British charts, this one went to… say it with
me, now… number seven.
Album score:
29
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 4
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Do Things My Own Way”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
|
“Hit Me, Baby”
| |
|
|
|
|---|
“Mess Up” (from Madder!)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
“Fantasize” (from Madder!)
| |
|
|
|
|---|
“Porcupine” (from Madder!)
| |
|
|
| |
Mad!, 2025
genre: minimalist pop/rock
And this one went to number two!
Unfortunately, if Drip, Drip, Drip felt like
the leftovers of the Hippopotamus sessions,
this one feels like the leftovers from Latte,
and that’s a step down from an album not quite on the same
tier.
Maybe the Maels themselves thought that this one was a bit half-baked,
though, because later the same year, they released their first EP,
a companion piece called
Madder!, and adding these four songs to the
mix would have boosted Mad! quite a bit.
The Madder! EP upgrades the minimalism that
Sparks has been exploring in the mid-2020s, building its songs
around some arrestingly out-there sonic hooks, and made me significantly
more optimistic about the next record than the main album had.
But who knows?
Russell Mael, soon to turn seventy-eight as I type this, has joked
that “with advances in medical technology, hopefully there will
be two to three hundred more Sparks albums”, and with so many
directions left to explore between now and the year 3000, they might
not pursue the Madder! sound and might instead
head off in a wild new direction next.
Album score:
13
(with Madder!: 23)
Rank among Sparks albums:
# 16
|
And there you have it—the saga of one of the greatest
bands of the last six decades, on the same tier as the Beatles and the
Who in quality, and with a rich and varied history surpassing that of
those legendary acts… and of whom I’d somehow never heard
until just now just before writing the first edition of
this article.
So who else has flown beneath my radar for all this time?
(Update 2026:
I actually have an answer to that, so watch this space for a link to
another one of these band retrospectives… uh, someday.)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|---|
|
|
comment on Tumblr |
reply via email |
support this site |
return to the Calendar page |
|
|
|